Talk:Anecdote
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Random comments
[edit]Isn't "" (as in "well-known examples") complete nonsense? Ask anyone -- they won't know either anecdote. Also, it's altogether beside the point whether they are "well-known" or not. <KF> 01:19, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
I agree. I'm changing the title to simply "Examples" for now. --NTak 01:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC).......... ;)~ I don't think so —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.106.184.250 (talk) 03:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Wallace Stevens
[edit]Anecdotes are always based on real life; an example is Wallace Stevens's "Anecdote of the Jar," discussed in Frank Lentricchia's essay, "In Place of an Afterword--Someone Reading," from Critical Terms for Literary Study (Chicago, 1995), p.429.
Lentricchia writes: "There's a little story once told by Wallace Stevens that I have to replot as I retell it. The story (Stevens's and mine) is actually an 'anecdote': from the Greek, anekdota, meaning unpublished items. More familiarly, in English, a small gossipy narrative generally of an amusing, biographical incident in the life of a famous person whose biography's broad outline has long been a matter of public record. And more: this biography is often--when the famous person is also exemplary--a concentrated representation of the idealized story that a culture would like to tell about itself. Like all anecdotes, then, the one I have in mind can't work as an anecdote unless it somehow tells a story beyond the one it tells." The forest's edge 21:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Famous thermodynamics anecdotes
[edit]--Libb Thims (talk) 02:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Stupid Evidence?
[edit]I'm sure there's a much better word for "stupid evidence," as well, I don't think stupid a neutral stance on the topic. "Subjective Evidence" or "Circumstantial Evidence" would be much better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.113.189.68 (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)